10
« on: May 26, 2009, 04:23:22 PM »
The Toll Takers of Ancient Times
Endless. Based upon word usage in past and present, I have discovered that the history about the aboriginal Greeks will probably go on forever and is still in the making. They belong to Shem, the high priest of the world after Noah and just because the adversary has manipulated words over time in order to confuse and control certain people, it does not mean that people cease to exist. The Zulu people are defined as being in South Africa today but, why has their origins not been made clear? They did not just appear in Africa. Common sense may tell us that the ancient Greeks were probably black but without script, the truth becomes evasive and then invisible. Without script, it seems as if we cease to be. The collective term, ‘Greek’ has lost its origins but, it was a broad term that describes the earliest ‘people’, La Dene, that migrated from Turkey and began to live along ‘the creeks’ [Greek-Creek] and riverbeds of the land. The word ‘Greek’ with ‘the letter C’ [i.e. Creon, Crete, Croesus, Creole...] then gives it a more complete definition in regards to the earliest civilizations that developed in Europe and their a**ociation with creeks and waterways. Upon this point though, it becomes important to state that, unless the origins of the earliest Greeks are made clear in script then, it will become difficult and almost impossible to understand the true history of the Greeks because of the many different kinds of people that became apart of their world in these early times. The Greeks did not come over to their inherited lands alone. Also, the geographical history of this earth becomes another crucial point that marks history very well especially for the earliest Greek civilizations. Why? Because scientific evidence proves that humanity cannot remain constant when certain major catastrophic events occur. Change becomes inevitable.
Certain major phenomena have caused so much widespread damages that they mark time well and prove that certain civilizations could not have remained unaffected. One such event that helps to better pinpoint early Greek history would be when the earth split. Although secular historians offer an evasive origin and they record this global disaster to have occurred millions of years ago, the Bible gives the time to be prior to the year 2016 B.C. and by the time of the death of a certain descendant of Shem; Peleg Shem. In fact, the very name of ‘Peleg’ defines this great time of change in the word ‘archipelago’ which means ‘a group of many island chains’[SEE Webster for, ‘archipelago’]! This date amazingly agrees with secular history and marks a great time of change in the Greek world. By the turn of that millennium, history and archeological records prove that there were well formed post-flood Greek cultures that came after the Stone age constructions in ancient Europe and, that had existed for about 250 to 300 years prior to the Great Earthquake of which marks, not only Greek history but, other happenings as well. When certain archeological similarities across the Mediterranean world are considered it soon becomes apparent that the land of Greece was heavily influenced by the Hamites and shows a progression of events. Prior to the Great Earthquake, the people of the land soon became organized into distinct groups a**ociated with ‘a horse culture’ and eventually, the amba**adors [Dors] of Cush-Ham began to develop Greek lands based upon the first great civilization of Babylon. Unlike the Hamitic kings who ruled their own lands by inherited rights, the early Greeks formed their cultures based upon ‘a shared system’ [leagues] of which later became known as ‘city-state’ societies. But, Hamitic kings did not seek to dominate the Semitic people so, the presence of the early Hamites became a beneficial existence up until the time when the An worshipers began to seek supreme dominion over all lands, a time which occurred before the earth split. Before then, however and because the Hamites were the first post-flood kings to upgrade humanity in so many ways, they even become the very backbone of Greek script form. However, the earliest Greeks went from being collectively known as Creek people to being known as ‘the Dene’ [var. Nadene, Bernadine, Berians, La-Dine, Ludino, Danube, Adana...] and then they became known by their unique societies and the palace communities that began to be built up by the Chaldeans of Cush-Ham, the masters at architecture. But after the earth split, the Greek Isles were born and new architectural events such as ‘the irrigation system’ constructed in ancient (Crete) Minoah marks a transfer of ideas from the collapsed civilizations of Cush-Babylon into a new Greek world.
Because modern day historians deliberately skip over this beginning foundation of Greek history, the aboriginal Greeks are always and conveniently covered up under the many other names of people that became apart of their lands. A closer look at some records do attest to the fact that the early Minoan Greeks [Minoah; Nim-min; of Nimrod Ham] of whom became later known as ‘the Dorian Greeks’ [Nimrod-dor; Dorian], ‘the Spartan Dorians’ and also, the Laconic Greeks [Lach-Chaldeans; Blacks], they were not the original Greeks. They were from Chaldea [present-day Iraq]. But no obvious information has seemingly been offered. Another very important and dominant kind of early people that brings much confusion to understanding early Greek history are ‘the Apollo Greeks’ [Jap-Ollo] and there were very many groups that stem from this collective term. The account of their major contributions have been so segmented that it prevents the true Greeks of Shem from becoming evident but it can surface. Even though the Apollo Greeks, the Minoah Greeks and so many others became an early part of Greek history and, even though the Minoans became the foundation of architecture and design of early Greek times, the true Greeks were still distinct. Indeed, their history becomes so extensive that it becomes overwhelming and would take a long time to unfold. One of the best approaches, I believe, to uncover so many thousands of years of hidden Greek history would be to connect them to their lands and to research certain words and names that are used to define them. By this approach, it becomes more and more clear that these early descendants of Shem had eventually spread out all over the world even in the earliest of times and one incredible name that links them to their original history and that ties them so firmly to the past and present would the name of , ‘Luz’ [Luz-Zulu].
Not only were the Luz people listed in the Bible to be the earliest civilization in a certain area in ‘the Middle East’ even before the Israelites existed but by the time after the Biblical Exodus, there was an intense account written in the Book of Judges that occurred between a man of the city of Luz [also known as Bethel] and the men of Joseph [Ephraim]. The outcome of this encounter that occurred in the 1300s after the death of Joshua and, between the Pirates of Joseph and this man of Luz [i.e. Lusitanian] leads to an attachment to their original inherited land of Turkey and, to their earlier name of which also travels through time for thousands of years up until these modern times; LYDIA [Ludia; Lud Shem]. This man of Luz left ‘the Middle East’ and went back to West Turkey, and named a region, Luz/Lydia, of which remained on the maps for thousands of years. But the entire country of modern day Turkey was originally called ‘ANATOLIA’ and written originally on maps as ‘ANADOLU’ and reveals that hundreds of years prior even at that time, it was the land of Lud Shem. The descendants of Lud Shem and other unique Luds such as the Luz became the first ‘Toll takers’ in their lands that frustrated the people of An. They, along with so many other Greek people became the victims of ‘anti-Semitism’ due to the An worshipers who came with supremacist ideals. The Luz people became severely suppressed by the Hittites and An worshipers from the east of whom eventually dominated ancient Turkey even before the earth split. Most historians admit that the Hittite city called ‘Hattusa’ [Khatti-Lusa] in Central Turkey was named after the original inhabitants but they also state that they don’t know who they were[?]. Scholars also state that there was an earlier people, the Luwian [Ludwian], of whom had a unique script form but then too, they claim ambiguity concerning the origins of it. Hundreds of years after the fall of Hattusa, this region of Central Turkey became temporarily known as, Phrygia [var. Ephrygia, Free-gia, Frisian...Friday], a collective name for the Greeks at that time.
In Conclusion, by the early time that mankind began to spread out from the country of Turkey and the Mediterranean Sea regions, these early Luz people of Anadolu had already formed and migrated from Turkey into Southern Europe and formed another shared civilization with the Nubians of North Africa. It was in this region that they became known as ‘Lusitanian’ and they spread out all across certain areas of Europe. So even before the earth split, the Luz people were already a distinct Greek people long before they became confined to the definition of being only, ‘the Zulu people’ of South Africa! The Luz people became so vast that, today, their names are still on the maps all over this world. The people of the Philippines, this very day, call themselves ‘the Luzon’ and the aboriginal people can be seen in some books with a deep, dark complexion, with afro-hair and are known as ‘Negritos’. The history of these ancient Greeks also align with the history of Hawaii and the very ‘gra** skirts’ and ‘mating dance’ connects to the Zulu maidens of the past! The original Hawaiian dance can best be seen probably, in South Africa where it would be fittingly called ‘the Zulu dance’!--Stolen history! It would take a long time to correct true history. But lastly, when I look at a British film production about the famous South African leader named, Shaka Zulu*, it seems to paint an uncanny bridge between past and present. Although the film becomes hard to watch due to the deliberate concentrations on the historical, violent acts that, in my opinion, exploits the beautiful actors and actresses with the aim to caste down hope for peace and Black beauty and, although the lead actor, the late Henry Cele,--[Bronze perfection!]--does not seem to look like the actual leader, ironically, he paints an image that connects the past to the present. The history of Shaka Zulu seems to show that it includes a heavy presence of Indian experiences with root names such as ‘Guni’, ‘Nandhi’ and etc. In my opinion, this film too, has a lot of deep seeded, underlying deception and biting mockery, for example, the scene with Shaka Zulu and a horse which gives a false illusion that the Zulus had for the first time become acquainted with the horse when in fact, that was apart of their very origins! Another cryptic issue was likening the Zulus to the ancient “Spartan army”, a phrase that might cause an uninformed person perhaps, to enjoy the film but later, go to school and ask their instructor, ‘Was there were ever any black Greeks before the Spartans’?!
Show Posts