76
General Discussion / Re: The Official Shades_Sungla**es Thread
« on: November 04, 2009, 11:57:42 AM »You guys seem to know a lot about gays and what they like
.jpg)
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
77
General Discussion / Re: Vote for Rob!
« on: November 04, 2009, 11:53:40 AM »
Lol, sure thing. You betta win! lol
78
General Discussion / Re: The Official Shades_Sungla**es Thread
« on: November 04, 2009, 11:11:42 AM »
*Sigh*
This thread is about fashion, not protecting your eyes.
Here is when you actually need to wear sungla**es:
1) When driving, you need polarised sungla**es in particular, to protect against glare ordinary, I'm-fashionable-look-at-me sungla**es won't help.
2) When you're at the north or south pole, similarly, you need polarised sungla**es to protect against glare.
3) White sandy beaches in bright sunlight.
etc.
You get the picture. You don't even need sungla**es to stare at the sun. I know you'll probably site tons of b.s. articles on the web. I went to a talk by a famous South African astronomer, Prof Fairall, where he explained to us it's very unlikely permanent damage will be caused to your eyes from even staring directly at the sun. Only temporary damage occurs. The idea that sunlight on the eyes causes any permanent damage is bullshit I'm afraid. Unless you're staring at a welding iron for five minutes straight without blinking, the chances of sunlight doing any damage is minimal or zero. How unlikely is that humans evolved in the savannah and we have problems with sunlight in our eyes hmm? You're telling me that just to walk down the street you need sungla**es to protect your eys? Bullshit. You know nobody here is doing anything that's likely to damage their eyes, and hence they have no need for sungla**es, unless e.g. for driving, in which case you need any old pair of polarised sungla**es, not the fashion statements on display here. Sunlight is in fact good for your eyes
http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/full_spectrum_sunlight.html
http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/sunbath.htm
In short, unless you have very sensitive eyes, in which case you need polarised sungla**es, the only time you need sungla**es or for driving etc., in which case the gla**es also need to be polarised. How many of the sungla**es here are polarised? The only medical benefit obtained from sungla**es would come from polarised sungla**es, not fashion statements. Don't try and bullshit anyone, this thread is about FASHION, and sungla**es as a fashion statement is gay. I rest my case your honour.
This thread is about fashion, not protecting your eyes.
Here is when you actually need to wear sungla**es:
1) When driving, you need polarised sungla**es in particular, to protect against glare ordinary, I'm-fashionable-look-at-me sungla**es won't help.
2) When you're at the north or south pole, similarly, you need polarised sungla**es to protect against glare.
3) White sandy beaches in bright sunlight.
etc.
You get the picture. You don't even need sungla**es to stare at the sun. I know you'll probably site tons of b.s. articles on the web. I went to a talk by a famous South African astronomer, Prof Fairall, where he explained to us it's very unlikely permanent damage will be caused to your eyes from even staring directly at the sun. Only temporary damage occurs. The idea that sunlight on the eyes causes any permanent damage is bullshit I'm afraid. Unless you're staring at a welding iron for five minutes straight without blinking, the chances of sunlight doing any damage is minimal or zero. How unlikely is that humans evolved in the savannah and we have problems with sunlight in our eyes hmm? You're telling me that just to walk down the street you need sungla**es to protect your eys? Bullshit. You know nobody here is doing anything that's likely to damage their eyes, and hence they have no need for sungla**es, unless e.g. for driving, in which case you need any old pair of polarised sungla**es, not the fashion statements on display here. Sunlight is in fact good for your eyes
http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/full_spectrum_sunlight.html
http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/sunbath.htm
In short, unless you have very sensitive eyes, in which case you need polarised sungla**es, the only time you need sungla**es or for driving etc., in which case the gla**es also need to be polarised. How many of the sungla**es here are polarised? The only medical benefit obtained from sungla**es would come from polarised sungla**es, not fashion statements. Don't try and bullshit anyone, this thread is about FASHION, and sungla**es as a fashion statement is gay. I rest my case your honour.
79
General Discussion / Re: The Official Shades_Sungla**es Thread
« on: November 03, 2009, 10:15:39 PM »
Sungla**es on a man = gay as Ricky Martin in a pink tutu and high heels. Im sorry. True dat.
80
Motoring Forum / Re: The N1 Beast
« on: November 02, 2009, 10:51:47 PM »
American cars, some of them, very few, may be good looking, but all there really good for is going fast in a straight line. And that's boring, and takes no skill. All the fun is in the curves boys...
81
General Discussion / Obama's Mother -- There are Nudes?
« on: November 01, 2009, 09:21:09 PM »
How embara**ing is this for Obama, if they're real
http://www.mofopolitics.com/2008/10/22/barack-obamas-mother-poses-in-sexually-explicit-photographs/
It's a f***ing racist, hate-on-Obama website, smh.
http://www.mofopolitics.com/2008/10/22/barack-obamas-mother-poses-in-sexually-explicit-photographs/
It's a f***ing racist, hate-on-Obama website, smh.
82
Motoring Forum / Re: overrated cars
« on: November 01, 2009, 08:45:46 PM »all Toyota whips inclusive are overrated
ORLY???
STATS:
0-60 mph: 3.6 Seconds
0-100 mph: 5.9 Seconds
1/4 Mile Elapsed Time: 10.7 At 142 mph
Top Speed: ~236 mph (380 km/h)
83
General Discussion / Re: stuff i dont comprehend
« on: November 01, 2009, 03:32:56 PM »
i dont appreciate it when newbies and some slug f***ers on this site try to gain fame by dissing me
a newbie can diss me as much as they like i aint responding to that intellectually weak attempt
84
Movie Talk / Re: cinema!
« on: November 01, 2009, 03:10:40 PM »
nigger when are you getting paid, i want you to buy me a McDonald's meal, treat a nigger out, feel me?
or take me to a cinema near and watch this shit
I didnt know you and panic were going out!
85
Battle One on One / Re: rihanna's cameltoe
« on: November 01, 2009, 03:03:34 PM »
omfg that's the hottest thing i've ever seen!
86
General Discussion / Re: stuff i dont comprehend
« on: October 28, 2009, 10:55:05 PM »
Mad do you have something to say to me?
87
General Discussion / Re: Start snitching, stop lying
« on: October 28, 2009, 05:16:39 PM »
You had to clear your name. The guy is obviously not one of your boys if he blames you for shit you never did, and serious stuff too. I wouldn't sweat it.
88
Humour / Jokes / Re: i had a dream about some of our agians
« on: October 27, 2009, 10:31:02 PM »
Damn, I didn't make Mad's list 
I guess I should go kill myself, huh?
I guess I should go kill myself, huh?
89
General Discussion / Re: nas disses pharell
« on: October 27, 2009, 10:23:08 PM »
Who cares? Nas, fiddy, pharell have all fallen the f*** off. I'm tired of this lame old trick of trying to start some stupid beef when an artists sales are low. f*** all that.
90
Hot Traxxx / Re: Crooked I Freestyle
« on: October 26, 2009, 06:16:50 PM »
Shitty sound quality, but crooked i is dope.