Get Dropox | Luno Bitcoin | Ovex Crypto | Binance | Get Free Crypto - Morpher
Africasgateway.com

WEED GOOD EMAIL BAD

the brand®

  • AG Veteran
  • *****
    • Posts: 4371
    • REP: +0/-14
    • Gender:Male
  • PAINT (25-03-11)
    • View Profile
    • http://myspace.com/childakapoet
E-mails 'hurt IQ more than pot'
Friday, April 22, 2005 Posted: 1208 GMT (2008 HKT)


 
Half of workers respond to an e-mail within an hour, survey found.
 
 
 
LONDON, England -- Workers distracted by phone calls, e-mails and text messages suffer a greater loss of IQ than a person smoking marijuana, a British study shows.

The constant interruptions reduce productivity and leave people feeling tired and lethargic, according to a survey carried out by TNS Research and commissioned by Hewlett Packard.

The survey of 1,100 Britons showed:


Almost two out three people check their electronic messages out of office hours and when on holiday


Half of all workers respond to an e-mail within 60 minutes of receiving one


One in five will break off from a business or social engagement to respond to a message.


Nine out of 10 people thought colleagues who answered messages during face-to-face meetings were rude, while three out of 10 believed it was not only acceptable, but a sign of diligence and efficiency.

But the mental impact of trying to balance a steady inflow of messages with getting on with normal work took its toll, the UK's Press a**ociation reported.

In 80 clinical trials, Dr. Glenn Wilson, a psychiatrist at King's College London University, monitored the IQ of workers throughout the day.

He found the IQ of those who tried to juggle messages and work fell by 10 points -- the equivalent to missing a whole night's sleep and more than double the 4-point fall seen after smoking marijuana.

"This is a very real and widespread phenomenon," Wilson said. "We have found that this obsession with looking at messages, if unchecked, will damage a worker's performance by reducing their mental sharpness.

"Companies should encourage a more balanced and appropriate way of working."

Wilson said the IQ drop was even more significant in the men who took part in the tests.

"The research suggests that we are in danger of being caught up in a 24-hour 'always on' society," said David Smith of Hewlett Packard.

"This is more worrying when you consider the potential impairment on performance and concentration for workers, and the consequent impact on businesses."


BHLAKHROZE

  • A POETRY OF LIVING
  • AG Veteran
  • *****
    • Posts: 3452
    • REP: +21/-17
    • View Profile
jo, i saw this and i was like o-k-a-y. i can believe it. sometimes i dont know whether im coming or going.

apparently sms's make you stupid too. thats just great. no more chatting to your sms-trigger-happy self...hehehe.
- soul activist. poet. flower. fairy -


the brand®

  • AG Veteran
  • *****
    • Posts: 4371
    • REP: +0/-14
    • Gender:Male
  • PAINT (25-03-11)
    • View Profile
    • http://myspace.com/childakapoet
I hope none of yall
r takin any vitamin supllements coz
they dont do anytthin but
increase chances of getting cancer

Ill paste in the info on that ..
fogot which site the research is


briCK

  • Gold digger bait!
  • AG Moderator
  • AG Veteran
  • *****
    • Posts: 6314
    • REP: +9/-10
    • Gender:Male
  • No!!!!! Hoe!
    • View Profile
So remmeber..

M-A-R-I-J-U...
A-J-U-A-N-A


i swear Academics got too much money and time on they hands..who funds these things ???
Trapped In The 90ies Nigga.


Naturelle

  • AG Moderator
  • AG Veteran
  • *****
    • Posts: 2520
    • REP: +11/-21
  • rise.
    • View Profile
    • Butan Wear

Lord Deacon Of Frost

  • Deac>>>>>>YOU
  • AG O.G.
  • *
    • Posts: 8688
    • REP: +44/-39
    • Gender:Male
  • You shall DIE!
    • View Profile
Quote from: "briCK"

i swear Academics got too much money and time on they hands..who funds these things ???

If they all got some a** once in a while there'd be none of these studies, givin up email is like givin up crack, we'll all suffer from withdrawal symptoms  :lol:  :lol:

That not good enough for ya?