16
Humour / Jokes / THE EPIC FAIL - Hall of Fame
« on: June 02, 2009, 12:25:37 PM »
Nominations anyone...?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
17
General Discussion / So she got raped
« on: April 06, 2009, 11:39:49 AM »
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=13&art_id=iol1239008548717N123
so the justice bitch got raped and the rapist got away
i say it does more against the ANC in the long run
so the justice bitch got raped and the rapist got away
i say it does more against the ANC in the long run
18
Sports Arena / UEFA Champions League Quarter-finals, semi-finals and final
« on: March 20, 2009, 08:41:17 AM »
20.03.2009 12.00 CET
The Draw is on today
i'll be in meetings all morning... so if someone can hooks it up. will really appreciate it
cant wait to see who plays who...
The Draw is on today
i'll be in meetings all morning... so if someone can hooks it up. will really appreciate it
cant wait to see who plays who...
19
Sports Arena / Champions League Match Day 7
« on: February 23, 2009, 09:27:41 PM »
Its on bishes...
and they shook
Vs
the tosser
yup. and then theres
Vs
the bulldog
ayo f*** a berbatov, im sure he'll be quiet
moving on....
Vs
for me Manchester Bankrupts best player... well next to Giggs
and not forgettin ...
The Red nosed gangster
Vs
The special One
and they shook
Vs
the tosser
yup. and then theres
Vs
the bulldog
ayo f*** a berbatov, im sure he'll be quiet
moving on....
Vs
for me Manchester Bankrupts best player... well next to Giggs
and not forgettin ...
The Red nosed gangster
Vs
The special One
20
General Discussion / Did he do it?
« on: February 18, 2009, 10:32:58 AM »
THE Joost van der Westhuizen sex tape saga descended into a tabloid frenzy yesterday as a celebrity magazine screened a grainy video purporting to show the former Springbok captain in compromising positions.
The 29-minute tape, which was shown to journalists, showed a man who bore some resemblance to Van der Westhuizen frolicking with what heat magazine described as a “vindictive young lady” wearing two G-strings “in the stripper tradition”.
It claimed that the video proved conclusively that Van der Westhuizen had cheated on his wife, singer Amore Vittone.
But the magazine did not identify the woman and provided little corroborating evidence in the accompanying story.
Twelve print, radio and television journalists watched the man, whom Van der Westhuizen strongly denies is him, arousing himself, running his hands over the woman’s body, and using a sex toy.
The screening took place at the offices of heat’s lawyers, Werksmans Attorneys.
The magazine also published explicit stills from the tape, accompanied by an article that reads: “The shocking exclusive pictures on these pages are stills from a video that was given to heat and contains [sic] scenes so explicit that it destroys the former Springbok captain’s reputation as a loyal family man”.
But the verdict is still out, with many present at the screening not convinced that it was Van der Westhuizen on the tape — so some people watched it again.
The woman in the video filmed it herself. She had hidden a camera in her handbag, which she frequently realigns to get clearer shots of the action.
And there is plenty of that — including the man kissing her buttocks, her performing fellatio on him, and both of them snorting lines of white powder she took out of her make-up bag and prepared on top of a DVD cover.
The man in the video looks remarkably like Van der Westhuizen, with his muscular body, and an identical hairstyle and body hair. But his voice, which would have helped to establish his identity, was drowned out by the constantly repeated Fleetwood Mac song Don’t Stop (thinking about tomorrow) .
Van der Westhuizen’s lawyer, Jan de Villiers, tried to prevent the media from seeing the video because the rugby hero had not had an opportunity to “have a copy … examined by experts” to determine whether it was authentic.
“Despite having undertaken informally to allow Mr Van der Westhuizen to have the video analysed, heat now wishes to have the video shown to the media without such analysis first being performed,” he said.
“We infer that this is because heat considers the video to be a fabrication, as this is the only reason why the magazine would resist the technical analysis proposed by Mr Van der Westhuizen. Instead of experts, heat now appears to intend to have the media act as experts.”
De Villiers claimed certain “physical characteristics clearly differentiate Van der Westhuizen from the man in the video”.
These differences include a tattoo he claims to have on his buttocks and his reported a**ertion that the man’s penis was “much bigger” than his.
“To show [the film] to the media at this juncture is either reckless or malicious, and is calculated to cause Mr Van der Westhuizen damage,” De Villiers said.
“The conduct of heat in seeking to further publicise the video …appears to be part of a conspiracy to a**a**inate his character and to hurt his family.”
De Villiers said the woman who filmed the tape was “guilty of criminal conduct” and he accused heat of having “questionable motives” in refusing to reveal her identity.
Van der Westhuizen said he has never cheated on his wife.
The 29-minute tape, which was shown to journalists, showed a man who bore some resemblance to Van der Westhuizen frolicking with what heat magazine described as a “vindictive young lady” wearing two G-strings “in the stripper tradition”.
It claimed that the video proved conclusively that Van der Westhuizen had cheated on his wife, singer Amore Vittone.
But the magazine did not identify the woman and provided little corroborating evidence in the accompanying story.
Twelve print, radio and television journalists watched the man, whom Van der Westhuizen strongly denies is him, arousing himself, running his hands over the woman’s body, and using a sex toy.
The screening took place at the offices of heat’s lawyers, Werksmans Attorneys.
The magazine also published explicit stills from the tape, accompanied by an article that reads: “The shocking exclusive pictures on these pages are stills from a video that was given to heat and contains [sic] scenes so explicit that it destroys the former Springbok captain’s reputation as a loyal family man”.
But the verdict is still out, with many present at the screening not convinced that it was Van der Westhuizen on the tape — so some people watched it again.
The woman in the video filmed it herself. She had hidden a camera in her handbag, which she frequently realigns to get clearer shots of the action.
And there is plenty of that — including the man kissing her buttocks, her performing fellatio on him, and both of them snorting lines of white powder she took out of her make-up bag and prepared on top of a DVD cover.
The man in the video looks remarkably like Van der Westhuizen, with his muscular body, and an identical hairstyle and body hair. But his voice, which would have helped to establish his identity, was drowned out by the constantly repeated Fleetwood Mac song Don’t Stop (thinking about tomorrow) .
Van der Westhuizen’s lawyer, Jan de Villiers, tried to prevent the media from seeing the video because the rugby hero had not had an opportunity to “have a copy … examined by experts” to determine whether it was authentic.
“Despite having undertaken informally to allow Mr Van der Westhuizen to have the video analysed, heat now wishes to have the video shown to the media without such analysis first being performed,” he said.
“We infer that this is because heat considers the video to be a fabrication, as this is the only reason why the magazine would resist the technical analysis proposed by Mr Van der Westhuizen. Instead of experts, heat now appears to intend to have the media act as experts.”
De Villiers claimed certain “physical characteristics clearly differentiate Van der Westhuizen from the man in the video”.
These differences include a tattoo he claims to have on his buttocks and his reported a**ertion that the man’s penis was “much bigger” than his.
“To show [the film] to the media at this juncture is either reckless or malicious, and is calculated to cause Mr Van der Westhuizen damage,” De Villiers said.
“The conduct of heat in seeking to further publicise the video …appears to be part of a conspiracy to a**a**inate his character and to hurt his family.”
De Villiers said the woman who filmed the tape was “guilty of criminal conduct” and he accused heat of having “questionable motives” in refusing to reveal her identity.
Van der Westhuizen said he has never cheated on his wife.
21
Producers - Discussion / The Golden Chariots Vol. 2 - The Sacred Bloodlines
« on: February 06, 2009, 10:54:32 AM »
aight so a while back i got hit up to contribute to this compilation project, was jealously miffed 
i wasnt included on a previous offering (Remixing the crates) so when i was hit up to contribute i was to put it midly, humbled.
So i present The Golden Chariots Vol. 2 - The Sacred Bloodline (i have no idea if there is a vol 1 and where it is but thats besides the point)
My nicca oints will of course get into the nitty gritty of it, and update all on whats happening with it and how far along it is.
Lets go!!
i wasnt included on a previous offering (Remixing the crates) so when i was hit up to contribute i was to put it midly, humbled.So i present The Golden Chariots Vol. 2 - The Sacred Bloodline (i have no idea if there is a vol 1 and where it is but thats besides the point)
My nicca oints will of course get into the nitty gritty of it, and update all on whats happening with it and how far along it is.
Lets go!!
23
General Discussion / So who is this Chick
« on: January 30, 2009, 03:13:17 PM »
Asked a few people who she is, no one knows so can anyone help a nicca. who is she?
ripped it of the hype disc. the one those octave couplet cats did.
[attachment deleted by admin]
ripped it of the hype disc. the one those octave couplet cats did.
[attachment deleted by admin]
24
Producers - Remix Showcase / Black's Dead Files.
« on: January 10, 2009, 12:36:31 PM »
Aight so ima up remixes everyweek of dead Mc's i like and tracks i generally feel.
Heres the first one. been listenining to a lot of boom bap, 90's shit so the slight influence was there with this mix.
The first instalment in the Dead File series.
I present.
Deadly combination - Big L feat (pac and BIG)
enjoy.
feel free to drop feedbacks.
[attachment deleted by admin]
Heres the first one. been listenining to a lot of boom bap, 90's shit so the slight influence was there with this mix.
The first instalment in the Dead File series.
I present.
Deadly combination - Big L feat (pac and BIG)
enjoy.
feel free to drop feedbacks.
[attachment deleted by admin]
25
Traders / Traktor Scratch Pro Audio 8 interface
« on: January 05, 2009, 03:54:25 PM »
Anyone got them sell
including the vinyls and the cd's but can do without.
but the most important being the Interface
including the vinyls and the cd's but can do without.
but the most important being the Interface
26
Producers - Discussion / REMIXES
« on: November 30, 2008, 02:26:30 PM »
Aight. most cats do remixes of songs by artists... thought i create a thread only dedictaed to that. drop any remix u done did... obviously for feedback. and also so anyone can see what u can do...
heres what i started working on this lazy sunday afternoon while waiting for the Arsenal - Chelsea Game. any feedback/faults/props etc will be very much appreciated
Mobb Deep - Hoodlum
heres what i started working on this lazy sunday afternoon while waiting for the Arsenal - Chelsea Game. any feedback/faults/props etc will be very much appreciated
Mobb Deep - Hoodlum
27
General Discussion / Girls and Cars
« on: November 06, 2008, 08:40:02 AM »
in light of all the seriousness lets take a moment to reflect on other issues... i.e. girls and cars...
who would simp... ay deac where u at.
who would simp... ay deac where u at.
28
General Discussion / African Literature
« on: October 30, 2008, 01:24:23 PM »
RIP Eskia Mphahlele
Yo... anyone here into African literature? can anyone recommend any good reads?
Yo... anyone here into African literature? can anyone recommend any good reads?
30
General Discussion / Mahatma Gandhi
« on: October 20, 2008, 03:35:27 PM »
On Mahatma Gandhi, his pathetic racism and advancement of segregation of black people
The greatest injustice against the struggle for liberation of black people was the projection of Mahatma Gandhi as committed to a cause against segregation. It is a fallacy that Gandhi in his struggles had any interests of black people at heart. His was a selfish cause to advance interests of Indians while encouraging continuing subjugation of black people. Gandhi held an absurd belief that Indians, along with whites, were a superior race to black people.
He said, “the British rulers take us to be so lowly and ignorant that they a**ume that, like the k******s who can be pleased with toys and pins, we can also be fobbed off with trinkets … ours is one continual struggle against a degradation sought to be inflicted upon us by the Europeans, who desire to degrade us to the level of the raw k****** whose occupation is hunting, and whose sole ambition is to collect a certain number of cattle to buy a wife with and, then, pa** his life in indolence and nakedness … k******s are as a rule uncivilised — the convicts even more so. They are troublesome, very dirty and live almost like animals.”
He conspired with the oppressive white government in promotion of segregation of black people and elevating the importance of Indians above them. Indians believed in their false sense of superiority in that they frequently complained of being mixed in with black people in railway cars, lavatories, pa** laws and in other regulations. They demanded special treatment and loathed being considered in the same regard as black people. He protested that, “we are cla**ed with the natives of South Africa — k****** race.”
Gandhi ensured that Indians received their elevation above black people and helped entrench segregation laws against black people. His major achievement was the creation of a separate entrance for Indians to the Durban Post Office who previously had to share with black people.
Gandhi wrote: “In the Durban Post and telegraph offices there were separate entrances for natives and Asiatics and Europeans. We felt the indignity too much and many respectable Indians were insulted and called all sorts of names by the clerks at the counter. We petitioned the authorities to do away with the invidious distinction and they have now provided three separate entrances for natives, Asiatics and Europeans.”
There is a growing tendency to try to portray Gandhi as some messiah who also advanced the cause of black people. He cared less about the plight of black people and his sole purpose was to see Indians receive preferential treatment and laws be amended to that effect; while laws governing black people remained in force. He endorsed the ridiculous notion of white supremacy probably in the hope and belief that it would a**ist his cause for Indians.
In 1903, Gandhi remarked, “we believe as much in the purity of race as we think they do, only we believe that they would best serve the interest, which is as dear to us as it is to them, by advocating the purity of all the races and not one alone. We believe also that the white race of South Africa should be the predominating race.”
Gandhi like Winston Churchill believed that black people were stupid savages and barbarians who were prone to unprovoked violence. He believed that the oppressed black people were a threat to their own cause and Indians need to save them from themselves. He said “it means that you take them under your (Indian) wing when you have developed that power of non-violence It will be good, if you fire them (black people) with the spirit of non-violence. You will be their saviour. But if you allow yourselves to be overwhelmed and swept off your feet, it will be their and your ruin.”
Gandhi saw himself as repository of solutions to the problem black people were confronted with, yet he was stubbornly opposed to the notion of black people and Indians fighting side by side against the monster the repressive white government was.
Gandhi, while he may have pretended to sympathise with the cause of black people and to some measure tolerated them, his conduct and utterances indicate that he too detested them. He condemned miscegenation and warned Indian men against canoodling with black women. “Some Indians do have contacts with k****** women. I think such contacts are fraught with grave danger. Indians would do well to avoid them altogether,” he said. Clearly he did not condone the sexual rendezvous of some white men in the Cape.
Gandhi, the phony non-violence activist was a decorated Sergeant Major on the side of the British during the Anglo-Boer War and supported the British during the Bambatha Rebellion in 1906 where Zulu impis and chiefs were ma**acred. His image as a peace-loving activist, champion of civil rights and an anti-racism activist is fallacious. Mahatma Gandhi was a pathetic racist who supported wars that maimed and left thousands dead and openly expressed his admiration for the ma** murderer, Adolf Hitler, to whom he wrote,“We have no doubt about your bravery or devotion to your fatherland, nor do we believe that you are the monster described by your opponents.”
To continue to honour and celebrate this man is to insult humanity!
http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/sentletsediakanyo/2008/10/17/on-mahatma-gandhi-his-pathetic-racism-and-advancement-of-segregation-of-black-people/
The greatest injustice against the struggle for liberation of black people was the projection of Mahatma Gandhi as committed to a cause against segregation. It is a fallacy that Gandhi in his struggles had any interests of black people at heart. His was a selfish cause to advance interests of Indians while encouraging continuing subjugation of black people. Gandhi held an absurd belief that Indians, along with whites, were a superior race to black people.
He said, “the British rulers take us to be so lowly and ignorant that they a**ume that, like the k******s who can be pleased with toys and pins, we can also be fobbed off with trinkets … ours is one continual struggle against a degradation sought to be inflicted upon us by the Europeans, who desire to degrade us to the level of the raw k****** whose occupation is hunting, and whose sole ambition is to collect a certain number of cattle to buy a wife with and, then, pa** his life in indolence and nakedness … k******s are as a rule uncivilised — the convicts even more so. They are troublesome, very dirty and live almost like animals.”
He conspired with the oppressive white government in promotion of segregation of black people and elevating the importance of Indians above them. Indians believed in their false sense of superiority in that they frequently complained of being mixed in with black people in railway cars, lavatories, pa** laws and in other regulations. They demanded special treatment and loathed being considered in the same regard as black people. He protested that, “we are cla**ed with the natives of South Africa — k****** race.”
Gandhi ensured that Indians received their elevation above black people and helped entrench segregation laws against black people. His major achievement was the creation of a separate entrance for Indians to the Durban Post Office who previously had to share with black people.
Gandhi wrote: “In the Durban Post and telegraph offices there were separate entrances for natives and Asiatics and Europeans. We felt the indignity too much and many respectable Indians were insulted and called all sorts of names by the clerks at the counter. We petitioned the authorities to do away with the invidious distinction and they have now provided three separate entrances for natives, Asiatics and Europeans.”
There is a growing tendency to try to portray Gandhi as some messiah who also advanced the cause of black people. He cared less about the plight of black people and his sole purpose was to see Indians receive preferential treatment and laws be amended to that effect; while laws governing black people remained in force. He endorsed the ridiculous notion of white supremacy probably in the hope and belief that it would a**ist his cause for Indians.
In 1903, Gandhi remarked, “we believe as much in the purity of race as we think they do, only we believe that they would best serve the interest, which is as dear to us as it is to them, by advocating the purity of all the races and not one alone. We believe also that the white race of South Africa should be the predominating race.”
Gandhi like Winston Churchill believed that black people were stupid savages and barbarians who were prone to unprovoked violence. He believed that the oppressed black people were a threat to their own cause and Indians need to save them from themselves. He said “it means that you take them under your (Indian) wing when you have developed that power of non-violence It will be good, if you fire them (black people) with the spirit of non-violence. You will be their saviour. But if you allow yourselves to be overwhelmed and swept off your feet, it will be their and your ruin.”
Gandhi saw himself as repository of solutions to the problem black people were confronted with, yet he was stubbornly opposed to the notion of black people and Indians fighting side by side against the monster the repressive white government was.
Gandhi, while he may have pretended to sympathise with the cause of black people and to some measure tolerated them, his conduct and utterances indicate that he too detested them. He condemned miscegenation and warned Indian men against canoodling with black women. “Some Indians do have contacts with k****** women. I think such contacts are fraught with grave danger. Indians would do well to avoid them altogether,” he said. Clearly he did not condone the sexual rendezvous of some white men in the Cape.
Gandhi, the phony non-violence activist was a decorated Sergeant Major on the side of the British during the Anglo-Boer War and supported the British during the Bambatha Rebellion in 1906 where Zulu impis and chiefs were ma**acred. His image as a peace-loving activist, champion of civil rights and an anti-racism activist is fallacious. Mahatma Gandhi was a pathetic racist who supported wars that maimed and left thousands dead and openly expressed his admiration for the ma** murderer, Adolf Hitler, to whom he wrote,“We have no doubt about your bravery or devotion to your fatherland, nor do we believe that you are the monster described by your opponents.”
To continue to honour and celebrate this man is to insult humanity!
http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/sentletsediakanyo/2008/10/17/on-mahatma-gandhi-his-pathetic-racism-and-advancement-of-segregation-of-black-people/